Free On-line Access
SPCI - Sociedade Portuguesa de Cuidados Intensivos
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
AMIB - Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira
How to Cite
Rosa RG, Robinson CC, Veiga VC, Cavalcanti AB, Azevedo LCP, Machado FR, et al. Qualidade de vida e desfechos em longo prazo após hospitalização por COVID-19: Protocolo para um estudo de coorte prospectivo (Coalizão VII). Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2021;33(1):31-37
10.5935/0103-507X.20210003
Qualidade de vida e desfechos em longo prazo após hospitalização por COVID-19: Protocolo para um estudo de coorte prospectivo (Coalizão VII)
Regis Goulart Rosa1,2, Caroline Cabral Robinson1, Viviane Cordeiro Veiga2,3, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti2,4, Luciano César Pontes de Azevedo2,5, Flávia Ribeiro Machado2,6, Otavio Berwanger7, Álvaro Avezum8, Renato Delascio Lopes9,10, Thiago Costa Lisboa2,4, Cassiano Teixeira1,2, Fernando Godinho Zampieri2,4, Bruno Martins Tomazini5, Letícia Kawano-Dourado4, Daniel Schneider1, Denise de Souza1, Rosa da Rosa Minho dos Santos1, Sabrina Souza da Silva1, Geraldine Trott1, Bruna dos Passos Gimenes1, Ana Paula de Souza1, Bruna Machado Barroso1, Lauren Sezerá Costa1, Liége Gregoletto Brognoli1, Melissa Pezzetti Pelliccioli1, Nicole dos Santos Studier1, Raíne Fogliati de Carli Schardosim1, Tainá Aparecida Haubert1, Victoria Emanuele Lobo Pallaoro1, Debora Mariani de Oliveira1, Pedro Isaacsson Velho1, Gregory Saraiva Medeiros1, Marcelo Basso Gazzana1, Alexandre Prehn Zavascki1, Paulo Márcio Pitrez1, Roselaine Pinheiro de Oliveira1, Carisi Anne Polanczyk1, Luiz Antônio Nasi1, Luciano Serpa Hammes1, Maicon Falavigna1
1
Hospital Moinhos de Vento - Porto Alegre (RS),
Brazil.
2
Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network (BRICNet)
- São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
3
BP-A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo - São Paulo
(SP), Brazil.
4
Research Institute, HCor-Hospital do Coração - São
Paulo (SP), Brazil.
5
Research and Education Institute, Hospital
Sírio-Libanês - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
6
Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Intensive Care,
Universidade Federal de São Paulo - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
7
Academic Research Organization, Hospital Israelita
Albert Einstein - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
8
International Research Center, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo
Cruz - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
9
Brazilian Clinical Research Institute - São Paulo (SP),
Brazil.
10
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University
Medical Center - Durham, NC, United States.
Conflicts of interest: None.
Responsible editor: Felipe Dal-Pizzol
Submitted on January 10, 2021
Accepted on February 02, 2021
Corresponding author: Regis Goulart Rosa, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 630, 10º andar, sala 1.021, Zip code: 90035-001 - Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil. E-mail: [email protected]
INTRODUCTION: The long-term effects caused by COVID-19 are unknown. The present study aims to assess
factors associated with health-related quality of life and long-term outcomes among
survivors of hospitalization for COVID-19 in Brazil.
METHODS: This is a multicenter prospective cohort study nested in five randomized clinical
trials designed to assess the effects of specific COVID-19 treatments in over 50 centers
in Brazil. Adult survivors of hospitalization due to proven or suspected SARS-CoV-2
infection will be followed-up for a period of 1 year by means of structured telephone
interviews. The primary outcome is the 1-year utility score of health-related quality
of
life assessed by the EuroQol-5D3L. Secondary outcomes include all-cause mortality,
major
cardiovascular events, rehospitalizations, return to work or study, physical functional
status assessed by the Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, dyspnea
assessed by the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale, need for long-term
ventilatory support, symptoms of anxiety and depression assessed by the Hospital Anxiety
and Depression Scale, symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder assessed by the Impact
of Event Scale-Revised, and self-rated health assessed by the EuroQol-5D3L Visual
Analog
Scale. Generalized estimated equations will be performed to test the association between
five sets of variables (1- demographic characteristics, 2- premorbid state of health,
3-
characteristics of acute illness, 4- specific COVID-19 treatments received, and 5-
time-updated postdischarge variables) and outcomes.
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of all participant
institutions. The results will be disseminated through conferences and peer-reviewed
journals.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Quality of life; Patient-reported outcome measures.
INTRODUCTION
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has received increased attention due to its ability to cause severe illness in a considerable proportion of infected patients.(1,2) Approximately 20% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients develop serious complications, including respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), shock, delirium, and multiple organ dysfunction.(3-5) Additionally, critically ill COVID-19 patients frequently present a high dependence on organ support with prolonged mechanical ventilation and longer lengths of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay.(6) These factors may result in the reduction of health-related quality of life (HRQL) due to critical illness-associated physical, cognitive and mental health disabilities.(7,8) In this context, observational studies with general critical care survivors have shown a higher occurrence of disabilities such as dependence for activities of daily living, cognitive dysfunction, anxiety, depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), as well as lower quality of life and long-term survival compared to the general population.(9-11)
Although observational studies assessing the impact of COVID-19 on acute and disease-centered outcomes are available,(12,13) data on long-term outcomes are scarce, and this evidence gap may constitute a barrier to understanding the needs of survivors of severe forms of COVID-19.
The primary objective of this study is to assess factors associated with one-year HRQL among adult survivors of COVID-19 hospitalization. Our secondary objective is to assess the occurrence and factors associated with all-cause mortality, major cardiovascular events, rehospitalizations, return to work or study, physical functional status, dyspnea, need for long-term ventilatory support, symptoms of anxiety, symptoms of depression, symptoms of PTSD, and self-rated health at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS
Study design
The present study is designed as a multicenter prospective cohort study that will enroll patients from five randomized clinical trials that were originally designed to assess the effects of specific COVID-19 treatments in Brazil (Coalition COVID-19 Brazil, Figure 1). Adult patients requiring hospitalization due to proven or suspected severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection will be followed through structured and centralized telephone interviews performed at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after enrollment. This study protocol was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (registration number: NCT04376658).
Participant eligibility
Patients aged 18 years or older, requiring hospitalization due to proven or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection and meeting eligibility criteria for Coalition I (NCT04322123),(14) Coalition II (NCT04321278),(15) Coalition III (Codex; NCT04327401),(16,17) Coalition IV (Action; NCT04394377) and Coalition VI (Tocibras; NCT04403685)(18) randomized clinical trials (Table 1) will be enrolled. Patients with a positive polymerase chain reaction result for SARS-CoV-2 will be considered as proven cases. Suspected cases will be defined according to the following factors included in the Brazilian Ministry of Health definition: presence of fever and at least one respiratory sign or symptom (dry or productive cough, shortness of breath, nasal or conjunctival congestion, difficulty swallowing, sore throat, runny nose, oxygen saturation < 95%, signs of cyanosis, rhinorrhea, intercostal circulation and dyspnea) and patients from an endemic region, traveling from an endemic region in the last 14 days, or in contact with a suspected or confirmed case in the last 14 days.(19)
Study
name (registry) |
Population | Interventions | Actual or estimat-ed
number of participants |
---|---|---|---|
Coalition
I (NCT04322123) |
Adult hospitalized patients with
proven or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection Needing either no oxygen or a maximum of 4L/minute of supplemental oxygen 14 or fewer days since symptom onset |
Arm 1: HCQ Arm 2: HCQ + AZM Arm 3: SOC |
667 (actual) |
Coalition
II (NCT04321278) |
Adult hospitalized patients with
proven or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection At least one of the following severity criteria: use of oxygen supplementation of more than 4L/minute flow, use of high-flow nasal cannula, use of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation, or use of mechanical ventilation 14 or fewer days since symptom onset |
Arm 1: AZM + SOC Arm 2: SOC |
447 (actual) |
Coalition
III (NCT04327401) |
Adult hospitalized patients with
proven or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection Receiving mechanical ventilation within 48 hours of meeting criteria for moderate to severe ARDS according to the Berlin definition* |
Arm 1:
dexamethasone Arm 2: SOC |
299 (actual) |
Coalition
IV (NCT04394377) |
Adult hospitalized patients with
confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 Onset of symptoms leading to hospitalization < 14 days and D-dimer ≥ 3 x the upper limit of normal |
Arm 1: full
anticoagulation Arm 2: SOC |
600 (estimated) |
Coalition
VI (NCT04403685) |
Adult hospitalized patients with
confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection More than 3 days of symptoms related to COVID-19 Computed tomography (or chest X-ray) with COVID-19 alterations Need for oxygen supplementation to keep SpO2 > 93%, or need for mechanical ventilation for less than 24 hours before the randomization At least two of the following inflammatory tests above the cutoff: D-dimer > 1,000ng/mL, C-reactive protein > 5mg/dL, Ferritin > 300mg/dL, Lactate dehydrogenase > upper-level limit |
Arm 1: tocilizumabe Arm 2: SOC |
150 (estimated) |
SARS-CoV-2 - severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; HCQ - hydroxychloroquine; AZM - azithromycin; SOC - standard of care; ARDS - acute respiratory distress syndrome; SpO2 - oxygen saturation.
* Acute respiratory failure within 1 week of a clinical insult or new worsening respiratory symptoms AND chest image with bilateral opacities - not fully explained by effusions, lobar/lung collapse, or nodules AND respiratory failure not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload AND positive end-expiratory pressure of 5cmH2O or more AND a partial pressure of arterial blood oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio of 200 or less.
Exclusion criteria include death during hospitalization, absence of telephone contact, absence of proxy for patients with communication difficulties (aphasia, cognitive impairment, severe hearing loss, or non-Portuguese speaker), and refusal or withdrawal of agreement to participate.
Outcomes
Primary outcome
The primary outcome is the 1-year utility score of HRQL assessed by the EuroQol-5D3L questionnaire (EQ-5D3L).(20) The EQ-5D3L comprises a descriptive system with five dimensions of health-related quality of life (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) and a visual analog scale (VAS) of patient self-rated health. The utility score derived from the descriptive system for the Brazilian population ranges from -0.176 (indicating the worst health status; serious problems in all domains) to 1.0 (indicating the best health status; no problems at all).(20) The minimal clinically important difference estimates of EQ-5D3L range from 0.03 to 0.52.(21)
Secondary outcomes
Secondary outcome measures include one-year all-cause mortality, major cardiovascular events (nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death), rehospitalizations, return to work or study, physical functional status assessed by the Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL),(22) dyspnea assessed by the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale,(23) need for long-term ventilatory support (oxygen, noninvasive ventilation, or mechanical ventilation), symptoms of anxiety and depression assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS),(24) symptoms of PTSD assessed by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R),(25) and self-rated health assessed by the EQ-5D3L VAS. All secondary outcomes will be assessed at four time points (3, 6, 9 and 12 months after enrollment).
Associated factors
Five sets of variables will be assessed as potential associated factors for HRQL and secondary outcomes: 1 - demographic characteristics (age and sex), 2 - premorbid health state (comorbidities, physical functional status one month before hospitalization, previous use of medications, such as corticosteroids, angiotensin II receptor blockers or conversion enzyme inhibitors), 3 - characteristics of acute illness (clinical, radiologic and laboratory manifestations of COVID-19, need for ICU admission, need for ventilatory support, need for neuromuscular blockers, need for vasopressor, need for renal replacement therapy, length of ICU stay, length of hospitalization), 4 - specific COVID-19 treatments received (hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, dexamethasone, and tocilizumab), and 5 - time-updated postdischarge variables (HRQL, physical functional status and symptoms of anxiety, depression, and PTSD).
Follow-up
The study will begin at the date of enrollment for coalition randomized clinical trials. Patients will be followed using structured telephone interviews performed 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after enrollment with a 30-day window period (15 days before and 15 days after the estimated date). The telephone follow-up calls will be centralized in a single center composed of researchers who have been trained in the use of standardized telephone interviews and who will be blinded to specific COVID-19 treatments. For patients with communication difficulties, the follow-up interviews will be conducted with their proxy. The proxy will be allowed to answer questions related to the following patient outcomes: mortality, rehospitalization, return to work or study, physical functional status, need for long-term ventilatory support, and HRQL. For each telephone follow-up (3, 6, 9, and 12 months), the patient will be classified as follow-up loss after ten attempts of telephone contact without success at different times on several days within the window period.
Procedures to ensure data quality
The following procedures will be performed to ensure the quality of the data:
To ensure standardization of the study procedures, the investigators responsible for data collection at each participating center will receive at least one training session prior to the beginning of recruitment.
The investigators at each participating center will have access to the study coordination centers as a means of dispelling doubts and solving potential problems.
The data will be entered on printed standardized data collection forms and stored in an electronic data capture system (REDCap, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA).(26) To ensure the adequacy of data transcription, routine doublechecking will be performed as data are entered into the electronic data capture system.
A data cleaning routine will be applied frequently. The investigators at the participating centers will be contacted in cases of inconsistencies or missing data. This information will also provide feedback regarding the need for retraining.
Telephone interviews will be taped and audited to verify consistency in data collection. The audio files will be anonymously stored in a server that meets the same security norms as those used for data in electronic medical records. Access to the files, which is restricted to the study team, will require user identification and a password.
Sample size
The sample size of the present study will be determined by the number of patients enrolled in the Coalition COVID-19 Brazil randomized clinical trials who were discharged from the hospital. Considering the in-hospital mortality ratio of published coalition studies (3% to 60%)(14-16) and an estimated one-year survival after hospitalization due to community-acquired pneumonia of 66%,(27) the present study will include approximately 1,000 participants. This sample size will allow a power of 80% to detect a difference of 0.05 utilities (within the range of minimally clinically important difference; 0.03 to 0.52)(21) among two groups of equal sizes at 12 months, with a standard deviation of 0.28 for utility values (estimated based on a previous publication)(10) and an alpha level of 0.05.
Handling of missing data
The missing values for the variables that compose HADS and IES-R will be imputed, replacing the missing items with the mean of the answered items in the same subscale, if at least half of that subscale has been answered.
Statistical analysis
We will examine the normality of the data by visual inspection of histograms and by using the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality. At baseline, continuous variables will be expressed as the mean and standard deviation or as the median and interquartile range. Categorical variables will be expressed as counts and percentages.
The adjusted result of the primary outcome (EQ-5D3L utility index) will be summarized for each comparison group using central tendency and dispersion measures, together with the mean or median difference as an effect size measure. All-cause mortality, major cardiovascular events, rehospitalization and return to work or study will be reported as incidence ratios. Physical functional status, degree of dyspnea, need for long-term ventilatory support, symptoms of anxiety, depression or PTSD, and self-rated health will be reported as prevalence ratios using clinically relevant cutoff points. The association between independent variables and outcomes will be assessed using generalized estimated equations accounting for the cluster effect (study of origin) and repeated measures. The variance inflation factor will be used to assess multicollinearity. A statistical significance level of 0.05 will be considered for all comparisons. Since this study is exploratory, we will not adjust analyses of secondary outcomes for multiple comparisons. Sensitivity analyses will be performed considering each coalition study as an independent cohort to check the consistency of the findings. Analyses will be performed with R software (R Development Core Team).(28)
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study will be conducted according to resolution no. 466/12 of the Brazilian National Health Council(29) and the Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice E6(R1).(30) All five randomized clinical trials that compose the present observational study, including their amendments for one-year telephone follow-up to assess quality of life and patient-centered outcomes at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, were approved by Brazil´s National Ethics Committee (Conselho Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa - Conep). Informed Consent will be collected from participants or their proxies at the time of enrollment for one of the five randomized clinical trials that compose this observational study. Participants will be reconsented during the first telephone contact. Enrolled patients or their proxies will have the option to withdraw from participation at any time. Records of participation in this study will be kept confidential and will be accessed in a restricted way only by researchers trained in good clinical practices, who will transfer the clinical information to specific forms (which do not have information that can identify the participants).
Dissemination
A detailed statistical analysis plan will be made available online. The study results will be submitted for publication regardless of the results after completion. We hope to make the study findings widely available and plan to disseminate our results through conferences and peer-reviewed journals. Due to the pandemic crisis and importance of study findings, we plan to submit preliminary data for publication.
DISCUSSION AND STUDY STATUS
The present study has the potential to clarify the possible impact of COVID-19 on health-related quality of life and long-term outcomes. After hospital discharge, patients affected by serious illnesses may develop physical, cognitive and/or psychiatric disorders that lead to prolonged recovery, higher consumption of healthcare resources, and possible impairment of quality of life.(31,32) In a systematic review of 53 studies, survivors of critical illness consistently reported having a poorer quality of life than healthy controls, even after age and sex adjustments.(33) Although the association between COVID-19 and health-related quality of life and long-term outcomes is plausible, the number of registered studies assessing the association between COVID-19 and long-term patient-centered outcomes is scarce.
The strengths of the present study are its prospective design, the inclusion of a large sample of survivors with severe forms of COVID-19, and the assessment of validated patient-centered outcomes. Potential study limitations include the uncertainty regarding the sample size needed to determine the quality of life and disabilities after hospitalization due to COVID-19, since high rates of mortality and morbidity following severe illness might contribute to losses to follow-up and the inability of the participants to effectively respond to telephone interviews.(34) Additionally, some persistent symptoms of COVID-19, such as anosmia, insomnia, and musculoskeletal complaints, will not be part of the long-term assessment.
The study design and protocol were finalized in March 2020. Coalitions I, II, III and VI have already finished the recruitment of participants. Currently, Coalition IV is enrolling participants. The beginning of telephone follow-ups started in July 2020. We expect to finish the one-year follow-up of all participants between February and April 2022.
This study is funded by local support from members of the Coalition COVID-19 Brazil (Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, HCor-Hospital do Coração, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, HP-A Beneficência Portuguesa, Brazilian Clinical Research Institute and Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the data collection teams at the participating hospitals and the follow-up researchers at Hospital Moinhos de Vento.
REFERENCES
Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB
Rua Arminda nº 93 - 7º andar - Vila Olímpia - São Paulo, SP, Brasil - Tel./Fax: (55 11) 5089-2642 | e-mail: [email protected]