Free On-line Access

SPCI - Sociedade Portuguesa de Cuidados Intensivos

Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva

AMIB - Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira

OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE MEDICINA INTENSIVA AND THE SOCIEDADE PORTUGUESA DE CUIDADOS INTENSIVOS

ISSN: 0103-507X
Online ISSN: 1982-4335

Ícone Fechar

How to Cite


 

Dal-Bó K, Silva RM, Sakae TM. Infecção hospitalar em uma unidade de terapia intensiva neonatal do Sul do Brasil. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2012;24(4):381-385

 

 

2012;24(4):381-385
Original Article - Clinical Research

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-507X2012000400015

Nosocomial infections in a neonatal intensive care unit in South Brazil

Infecção hospitalar em uma unidade de terapia intensiva neonatal do Sul do Brasil

Karla Dal-BóI, Rosemeri Maurici da SilvaII, Thiago Mamôru SakaeI

IMaster's Program in Health Sciences, Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina - Unisul - Tubarão (SC), Brazil.
IIProgram in Health Sciences Coordinator, Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina - Unisul - Tubarão (SC), Brazil.

Conflicts of interest: None.

Submitted on September 11, 2012
Accepted on October 11, 2012

Corresponding author:

Karla Dal-Bó
Programa de Mestrado em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina
Avenida José Acácio Moreira, sem número
Zip Code: 88704-900 - Tubarão (SC), Brasil
E-mail: [email protected]

 

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the incidence and epidemiology of nosocomial infection in newborns who were admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit in a hospital in south Santa Catarina, Brazil.
METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted for 1 year among 239 neonates who remained as in-patients 48 hours after admission. The criteria that were used to diagnose infection were in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Health Surveillance Agency.
RESULTS: The incidence of nosocomial infection was 45.8%. The primary reasons for admission were primary bloodstream infection (80.7%) and pneumonia (6.7%). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was the most commonly identified agent in the blood cultures and in the hospital unit. Prematurity was the most prevalent reason for admission. The general mortality rate was 12.1%, and mortality from nosocomial infection was 33.8%.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of nosocomial infection in the hospital unit was higher than rates that have been reported in other national studies. The major types of nosocomial infection were primary bloodstream infection and pneumonia.

Keywords: Nosocomial infection, Hospitalization, Neonatal intensive care, Brazil

 

 

INTRODUCTION

A nosocomial infection is an infection in which the clinical, laboratorial and microbiological diagnostic evidence is found after the first 48 hours of admission in a hospital unit.(1)

Nosocomial infection is a common complication in hospitalized patients(2,3) and is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).(4) Neonatal mortality, or death in the first 28 days of life, accounts for one-third of child mortality worldwide.(5)

The incidence of nosocomial infection varies between 18% and 34%(6-10) and accounts for as much as 40% of all neonatal deaths in developing countries.(5)

Studies suggest that approximately one-third of nosocomial infections would be preventable if hospitals had effective infection control protocols.(9) Despite epidemiological surveillance programs and preventative measures to control nosocomial infections, the risk of their development remains unacceptably high.(8)

Infections that are acquired in neonatal units are unique in many aspects. Newborns are extremely susceptible to infections for several reasons: their immune systems are still developing, so they have inefficient mucosal and cutaneous barriers, and they are exposed to variety of therapeutic interventions, such as the use of invasive devices and broad-spectrum antimicrobials.(7) These therapeutic interventions make newborns targets for infectious agents and the complications that follow. The defenses are even more fragile in premature neonates and in newborns with a low birth weight.(7,8,11)

Recent technological advances, particularly for premature or low birth weight neonates, have improved the neonatal survival rate. However, the improvements are associated with the use of invasive procedures and long-term admission in the NICU, which is associated with a higher risk of complications, including nosocomial infection.(9,12) Many factors contribute to poor hand hygiene, such as overcrowding, understaffing, work overload and an insufficient number or inconvenient location of washbasins. Inadequately trained staff and limited resources can also increase the risk of cross infection.(13,14)

The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence of nosocomial infection in a neonatal intensive care unit in south Brazil.

 

METHODS

This study was performed at the Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição in Tubarão (SC), Brazil. The unit contains 12 hospital beds, including 9 neonatal and 3 pediatric beds. The hospital is a non-profit organization that treats patients who are born at the hospital and patients from the Associação de Municípios da Região de Laguna (AMUREL), which is a micro-region that includes 16 municipalities in south Santa Catarina.

A prospective cohort study was performed from January 1 until December 31, 2010. The study included all newborns (up to 28 days of age) who were admitted to the NICU and who remained as in-patients 48 hours after admission. To diagnose nosocomial infection, the unit followed criteria from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Health Surveillance Agency (Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária - ANVISA).(1,15,16) After the legal guardian signed a free and informed consent form, each patient was followed from admission to discharge from the NICU or death. Refusal by the legal guardian to participate in the study was the only exclusion criterion. Data collection was performed by completing a pro-forma that was based on medical records, an interview with the mother, an analysis of the "Pregnant Woman's Card" ("Carteira de Gestante") and an inspection of the prenatal and neonatal exam records. In addition to mortality data from the unit, the pro-forma contained clinical details of the patient, such as the birth weight, delivery method, sites of infection and results of lab cultures. Blood cultures were considered to be positive when they were collected using aseptic techniques and from three different samples from the patient.

As a form of surveillance to understand the colonizing flora in the unit, axillary, nasal and rectal swabs were collected weekly for all admitted neonates.

A database was created to analyze the information from the pro-forma. Excel and SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) 16.0 for Windows were used for statistical analyses. Incidences were calculated for the total infections and the site of infections. This project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Unisul on December 15, 2009 (reference 09.603.4.01.III).

 

RESULTS

Out of 239 neonates who were followed, 71 (45.8%) developed 155 nosocomial infections. Data related to the site of nosocomial infections are shown in table 1.

The primary reasons for admission were prematurity (165/22.3%), early sepsis (112/15.2%), neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (103/13.9%), jaundice (77/10.4%) and transient tachypnea of the newborn (41/5.5%).

Neonatal weight varied from 700 to 4,385 g, and the average weight was 2,194 g (standard deviation - SD ±0.8). A total of 176 neonates (73.6%) were delivered by cesarean.

The procedures that were performed in the unit included 177 cases of peripheral venipuncture (43.8%), 98 cases of umbilical catheterization (24.2%), 83 cases of endotracheal intubation (20.5%), 34 cases of urinary bladder catheterization (8.4%), 27 cases of surfactant administration (6.7%), 22 cases of parenteral nutrition (5.4%), 21 cases of phlebotomy (5.2%), 16 cases of thoracic drainage (3.9%), 7 cases of exchange transfusion (1.7%), 2 cases of nitric oxide inhalation (0.4%) and 1 case of penrose drainage (0.2%).

Forty-eight blood cultures (67.6%) were collected from the neonates who were diagnosed with nosocomial infection, and 13 (27.1%) of the cultures were positive. The microorganisms that were identified from the blood cultures are shown in table 2.

Hospital unit colonization was identified using axillary, nasal and rectal swabs in 132 (55.2%), 101 (42.3%) and 110 (46%) patients, respectively. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was the most common microorganism that was identified (81 cases).

During the study, 210 patients (87.9%) were discharged from the NICU, and the mortality rate was 12.1%. Mortality associated with nosocomial infection was 33.8%.

 

DISCUSSION

Nosocomial infections, particularly in NICUs, are recognized as one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized neonates.(9) NICUs have unique characteristics that are reflected in the epidemiology of nosocomial infections. A constant and active surveillance system is necessary to control the factors that aggravate the risk of these infections. Despite an increased interest in the topic, there are relatively few studies that illustrate the epidemiological aspects and risk factors for nosocomial infections in Brazilian NICUs.

The incidence of nosocomial infection varies in the literature. It is important to note that methodological and conceptual differences occur between studies, and much care should be taken when comparing frequencies of infection in different studies. The diagnosis of neonatal infection is one of the most difficult tasks in medicine and is initially made on the basis of clinical evaluation, pre-established guidelines and an adequate surveillance system.

The results of this study showed a 45.8% incidence of nosocomial infection in the hospital unit, which is similar to that found in other national studies. For example, Nagata et al.(11) reported an incidence of 50.7%, and Couto et al.(17) reported an incidence of 36.6%. However, other recent Brazilian studies have reported lower incidence rates, such as 14.5% in Brito et al.(18) and 18.3% in Lopes et al.(19)

In international studies, the incidence of nosocomial infection varies between 10% and 30%.(6,8,10,20-22) The differences among the studies can be attributed to different surveillance methods for calculating the incidence of nosocomial infection. However, international rates are much lower than what was found in the present study and what has been reported in other national studies. The elevated rates may be partially attributed to overcrowded units, differences in work situations, inadequate facilities within units (i.e., less space between beds than is recommended by ANVISA and the CDC), insufficient equipment and understaffing. These problems are chronic and persistent in NICUs in developing countries.(11)

The most prevalent nosocomial infection types in the present study were clinical sepsis and pneumonia, which is consistent with the literature.(7,23,24)

According to the World Health Organization (WHO),(25) caesarian delivery should correspond to a maximum of 15% of births. However, using data from the public and private sectors in Brazil, the Ministry of Health(26) reports that caesarians correspond to 43% of births. For private health care plans, the caesarian rates are as high as 80%. In the Unified Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS) of Brazil, caesarians account for 26% of all deliveries.

A normal delivery is the safest option for the mother and baby. Because they are a surgical procedure, caesarians should only be indicated in situations that are high risk for the mother or fetus. However, caesarians are often scheduled before labor commences, which increases the risk of newborns developing acute respiratory problems.(27,28) Consequently, caesarians can increase the need for NICU admission.

In the present study, caesarian rates reached 73.6%, which compares to national rates of 52.5% in Távora et al.(7) and 40.8% in Pinheiro et al.;(29) international rates of 48.8% in van der Zwet et al.(22) and 62.8% in Jeong et al.(6) are also lower. These rates are all above the rate that is recommended by the WHO. The service at the Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição in Tubarão is the reference hospital for the southern region of the state, and many patients are at high risk, which could justify an increased percentage of caesarians. Furthermore, HNSC provides care to patients with both public and private health care, and private patients have a well-described preference for surgical delivery.(30)

Peripheral venipuncture was the most frequently conducted procedure in the present study, followed by umbilical catheterization, urinary bladder catheterization, surfactant administration, parenteral nutrition, venous dissection and thoracic drainage. In Cuba, Couto-Ramos et al.(31) reported similar procedures, and percutaneous catheterization and parenteral nutrition were the most common.

The results of the blood cultures were consistent with previous literature.(32) Some authors have suggested that Klebsiella sp account for most of the infections in underdeveloped countries. In technologically advanced countries, Gram-positive cocci, such as coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, account for most of the infections.(5,17,33,34) Despite a relatively low rate of positive blood cultures in the present study, the microbial agents were consistent with national and international studies; coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was the most commonly identified agent.(11,18,35) Previous studies have identified significant risk factors for coagulase-negative Staphylococcus infection, including admission to NICU, the use of a venous catheter, mechanical ventilation and parenteral nutrition.(36,37)

Previous literature describes the use of swabs to investigate colonizing flora in hospital units,(19) and, as in this study, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was the microbial agent that was most commonly involved in colonization.

In recent years, an increase in the survival rate of neonates can be attributed to improvements in the quality of and access to health care services.(11,19) Nevertheless, the mortality rates in NICUs in developing countries, which vary from 11.9% to 14.7%,(11,18) are higher than the rates in developed countries, which vary from 6.1% to 7.1%.(8,21) The mortality rate in the present study (12.1%) is in accordance with the national average. It is important to highlight that the severity of illness and type of patient in the hospital unit can influence the morbidity and mortality in critically ill neonates.(11) Morbidity and mortality can be reduced with better infrastructure, more advanced technologies, improved access to knowledge and training in infection control processes, better health care systems and additional financial resources.(5)

In an epidemiological study on neonatal infections at the Hospital Universitário de Londrina (PR), Lopes et al.(19) found nosocomial infection a mortality rate of 15.8%, which is similar to the rate that was reported by Auriti et al.(8) in an Italian cohort study (12.7%). In a cohort study performed in Londrina, Nagata et al.(11) found a nosocomial infection mortality rate of 24.1%, which is closer to the rate in the present study (33.8%). It is extremely difficult to establish the role that nosocomial infection has on the death of a neonate who is admitted to a NICU. Infants are vulnerable to many complications from their initial condition, and several coexisting factors can contribute to undesirable outcomes.

 

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of nosocomial infection in the studied hospital unit was higher than rates that have been reported in other national studies. Primary bloodstream infection and pneumonia were the primary types of infection. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was the most commonly identified microbial agent.

 

REFERENCES

1. Brasil. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Neonatologia: critérios nacionais de infecções relacionadas à assistência à saúde. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2008.

2. Best M, Neuhauser D. Ignaz Semmelweis and the birth of infection control. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(3):233-4.

3. Miranda CM, Navarrete TL. Semmelweis y su aporte cientifico a la medicina: Un lavado de manos salva vidas. Rev Chil Infectol. 2008;25(1):54-7.

4. Aziz K, McMillan DD, Andrews W, Pendray M, Qiu Z, Karuri S, Lee SK; Canadian Neonatal Network. Variations in rate of nosocomial infection among Canadian neonatal intensive care units may be practice-related. BMC Pediatr. 2005;5:22.

5. Zaid AK, Huskins WC, Thaver D, Bhutta ZA, Abbas Z, Goldmann DA. Hospital- acquired neonatal infections in developing countries. Lancet. 2005;365(9465):1175-88.

6. Jeong IS, Jeong JS, Choi EO. Nosocomial infection in a newborn intensive care unit (NICU), South Korea. BMC Infect Dis. 2006;6:103.

7. Távora AC, Castro AB, Militão MA, Girão JE, Ribeiro KB, Távora LG. Risk factors for nosocomial infection in a Brazilian neonatal intensive care unit. Braz J Infect Dis. 2008;12(1):75-9.

8. Auriti C, Maccallini A, Di Liso G, Di Ciommo V, Ronchetti MP, Orzalesi M. Risk factors for nosocomial infections in a neonatal intensive-care unit. J Hosp Infect. 2003;53(1):25-30.

9. Kawagoe JY, Segre CM, Pereira CR, Cardoso MF, Silva CV, Fukushima JT. Risk factors for nosocomial infections in critically ill newborns: a 5-year prospective cohort study. Am J Infect Control. 2001;29(2):109-14.

10. Urrea M, Pons M, Serra M, Latorre C, Palomeque A. Prospective incidence study of nosocomial infections in a pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003;22(6):490-4.

11. Nagata E, Brito AS, Matsuo T. Nosocomial infections in a neonatal intensive care unit: Incidence and risk factors. Am J Infect Control. 2002;30(1):26-31.

12. Malveira SS, Moraes AN, Chermont AG, Costa DL, Silva TF. Recém-nascidos de muito baixo peso em um hospital de referência. Rev Para Med. 2006;20(1):41-6.

13. Segre CA. Perinatologia: fundamentos e prática. São Paulo: Sarvier; 2002. p. 854-6.

14. Ng PC, Wong HL, Lyon DJ, So KW, Liu F, Lam RK, et al. Combined use of alcohol hand rub and gloves reduces the incidence of late onset infection in very low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004;89(4):F336-40.

15. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health-care associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36(5):309-32. Erratum in Am J Infect Control. 2008;36(9):655.

16. Richards MJ, Edwards JR, Culver DH, Gaynes RP. Nosocomial infections in pediatric intensive care units in the United States. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Pediatrics. 1999;103(4):e39.

17. Couto RC, Carvalho EA, Pedrosa TM, Pedroso ER, Neto MC, Biscione FM. A 10-year prospective surveillance of nosocomial infections in neonatal intensive care units. Am J Infect Control. 2007;35(3):183-9.

18. Brito DV, Brito CS, Resende DS, Moreira do Ó J, Abdallah VO, Gontijo-Filho PP. Nosocomial infections in a Brazilian intensive care unit: a 4-year surveillance study. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2010;43(6):633-7.

19. Lopes GK, Rossetto EG, Belei RA, Capobiango JD, Matsuo T. Estudo epidemiológico das infecções neonatais no Hospital universitário de Londrina, Estado do Paraná. Acta Sci Health Sci. 2008;30(1)55-63.

20. Olsen AL, Reinholdt J, Jensen AM, Andersen LP, Jensen ET. Nosocomial infection in a Danish Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: a prospective study. Acta Paediatr. 2009;98(8):1294-9.

21. Orsi GB, d'Etorre G, Panero A, Chiarini F, Vullo V, Venditti M. Hospital-acquired infection surveillance in a neonatal intensive care unit. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37(3):201-3.

22. van der Zwet WC, Kaiser AM, van Elburg RM, Berkhof J, Fetter WP, Parlevliet GA, et al. Nosocomial infection in a Dutch neonatal intensive care unit: surveillance study with definitions for infection specifically adapted for neonates. J Hosp Infect. 2005;61(4):300-11.

23. Ravelo Gonzáles M, Ferrer Del Castillo EA, Ulloa Espinosa C, Rodríguez Castro O. Comportamiento de infecciones nosocomiales en un período de doce años. Rev Cuba Pediatr. 2007;80(2).

24. Contreras-Cuellar GA, Leal-Castro AL, Prieto R, Carvajal-Hermida AL. Device-associated infections in a Colombian neonatal intensive care unit. Rev Salud Publica (Bogota). 2007;9(3):439-47.

25. Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS). CID-10: Classificação estatística internacional de doenças e problemas relacionados à saúde. São Paulo: EDUSP; 1999. vol. 1. p.1183-6.

26. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Portal da Saúde. Campanha Incentivo ao Parto Normal. Disponível em: http://portal.saude.gov.br/portal/saude/visualizar_texto.cfm?idtxt=28513. Acesso em 6 de junho de 2011.

27. Lee YM, D'Alton ME. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: maternal and neonatal complications. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;20(6):597-601.

28. Farchi S, Di Lallo D, Franco F, Polo A, Lucchini R, Calzolari F, et al. Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery in a population-based study of low-risk pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(6):729-32.

29. Pinheiro MS, Nicoletti C, Boszczowk I, Puccini DM, Ramos SR. Infecção hospitalar em unidade de terapia intensiva neonatal: há influência do local de nascimento? Rev Paul Pediatr. 2009;27(1):6-14.

30. Waniez P, Wurttz B, Brustlein V. [Abuse of caesarean delivery in Brazil: geographic dimensions of a medical aberration]. Sante. 2006;16(1):21-31. French.

31. Couto-Ramos MJ, Aliño Santiago M, Céspedes Barrientos O, Ferreiro Rodríguez A, Villalta Lima MJ. Infección de inicio tardío: vigilância y control. Rev Cuba Pediatr. 2007;80(2).

32. Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, Wright LL, Carlo WA, Ehrenkranz RA, et al. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics. 2002;110(2 Pt 1):285-91.

33. Srivastava S, Shetty N. Healthcare-associated infections in neonatal units: lessons from contrasting worlds. J Hosp Infect. 2007;65(4):292-306.

34. Hermann DM, Amaral LM, Almeida SC. Fatores de risco para o desenvolvimento de sepse neonatal tardia em uma unidade de terapia intensiva. Pediatria (São Paulo). 2008;30(4):228-36.

35. Brady MT. Health care-associated infections in the neonatal intensive care unit. Am J Infect Control. 2005;33(5):268-75. Review.

36. Cunha ML, Lopes CA, Rugolo LM, Chalita LV. Significância clínica de estafilococos coagulase-negativa isolados de recém-nascidos. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2002;78(4):279-88.

37. Keim LS, Torres-Filho SR, Silva PV, Teixeira LA. Prevalence, aetiology and antibiotic resistance profiles coagulase negative staphylococci isolated in a teaching hospital. Braz J Microbiol. 2011;42(1):248-55.

 

 

This study was conducted at the Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição - HNSC - Tubarão (SC), Brazil.

 

 

Submission On-line

Indexed in

Scopus

SciELO

LILACS

Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB

Rua Arminda nº 93 - 7º andar - Vila Olímpia - São Paulo, SP, Brasil - Tel./Fax: (55 11) 5089-2642 | e-mail: [email protected]

Cookie Policy

GN1 - Systems and Publications