Free On-line Access

SPCI - Sociedade Portuguesa de Cuidados Intensivos

Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva

AMIB - Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira

OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE MEDICINA INTENSIVA AND THE SOCIEDADE PORTUGUESA DE CUIDADOS INTENSIVOS

ISSN: 0103-507X
Online ISSN: 1982-4335

Ícone Fechar

How to Cite


 

Torres A. Corticosteroides na PAC grave: pontos a favor. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2015;27(3):202-204

 

 

2015;27(3):202-204
COMMENTARIES

10.5935/0103-507X.20150041

Corticosteroids for severe CAP: the pros

Corticosteroides na PAC grave: pontos a favor

Antoni Torres1,2

1 Servei de Pneumologia, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona - Barcelona, Spain
2 Universitat de Barcelona. IDIBAPS. CIBERES - Barcelona, Spain

Conflicts of interest: None.

Submitted on July 14, 2015
Accepted on August 06, 2015

Corresponding author: Antoni Torres, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036 - Barcelona, Spain. E-mail: atorres@clinic.ub.es

 

Severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) occurs in approximately 10% of hospitalized patients with CAP, and it still carries a high morbidity and mortality. In a multicenter study on severe pneumococcal CAP, the mortality of this population was 29%, with high rates of patients requiring mechanical ventilation and a shock.(1) Patients with severe CAP might die despite early and adequate antibiotic treatment, which is probably partially due to an imbalanced and disproportionate local and systemic inflammatory response that contributes to the impairment of alveolar gas-exchange, sepsis and end-organ dysfunction.(2)

There is no doubt that systemic adjunctive corticosteroid therapy attenuates the local and systemic inflammatory response(3) and may potentially decrease acute respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis and mortality. In a model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in mechanically ventilated piglets, we observed a lower lung bacterial burden and less severe histological pneumonia in piglets that were treated with corticosteroids plus antibiotics.(4) In humans, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been performed, with the participants largely being hospitalized, non-severe CAP patients. The results of these trials have been negative(5) or have demonstrated a reduction in the length of stay(6) or in the period required to reach clinical stability.(7) Four previous studies have been performed on severe CAP.(8-11) A meta-analysis that included some of these studies(12) demonstrated that the pooled effect of steroids in severe CAP is a reduction in mortality.

However, in most of the RCTs, the following pitfalls are present:

    1. The inclusion of patients with a low severity of CAP, i.e., PORT I to III classes, who are. These patients have a low mortality and, consequently, it would be very difficult to perform a RCT in this population with a primary end-point of mortality.

    2. The inclusion of patients independent of the initial level of inflammation. According to the rationale of using steroids in CAP, a high inflammatory response is imperative. Until now, this variable has not been taken into account. In addition, patients with a high inflammatory response (such as a high C-reactive protein - CRP) have a higher rates of treatment failure(13) and mortality.(14)

    3. The dosages, type and length of treatment are very different between RCTs, which makes it very difficult to establish comparisons among them.

    4. The primary end-points are different between studies. Some of them are “soft”, such as the length of stay or clinical stability. The first is very subjective and the second is driven by the abolishment of fever by corticosteroids.

We performed a RCT(15) comparing methyl-prednisolone (0.5mg/kg every 12 hours for 5 days) versus placebo with the following important differential characteristics:

    1. We only included severe CAP patients with criteria of severe CAP (major or minor modified American Thoracic Society (ATS) criteria or Pneumonia Severity Index - PSI - V).

    2. We choose a threshold of 15mg/L of CRP in the blood.

    3. Instead of choosing mortality as a primary end-point, we chose treatment failure. Treatment failure in CAP is associated with a higher mortality, which our group previously demonstrated. In the present study, we used a composite end-point, including early or late treatment failure.

    4. We monitored the systemic inflammatory (CRP, IL6, IL8, IL10 and TNF-alpha) response until day 7 after the inclusion of a patient in the trial.

We observed a decrease from 31% to 13% in treatment failure (p = 0.02). In other words, corticosteroids reduced the risk of treatment failure with an odds ratio of 0.34. The mortality did not differ between the groups (10% in the methylprednisolone arm versus 15% in the placebo arm; p = 0.37). This reduction in treatment failure was more evident for late treatment failure (3 versus 25%; p = 0.001) and especially in radiographic progression, which is one of the variables included in the composite definition of late treatment failure (2 versus 15%; p = 0.007). The rates of side effects were not important and were similar between the arms.

Potential pitfalls of our study were the long-term recruitment period (8 years) and that we used methylprednisolone for only 5 days with an abrupt interruption of the treatment. However, we monitored inflammation until day 7 and did not observe a rebound of the inflammatory response.

What is the interpretation of our results?

In agreement with the editorial comment accompanying the article,(16) we explain that lower rates of treatment failure, particularly late failure, and of radiographic progression can be due to stopping the progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome or the potential blocking of the Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction, which is thought to be due to high concentrations of cytokine release after the initiation of antibiotics. This process is possibly influenced by the release of endotoxin or other bacterial mediators in patients with a high bacterial burden, considering it also occurs in meningococcal disease.(17)

Having said that, it is time to start introducing corticosteroids into the clinical practice for treating severe CAP. To do so, we need to select severe CAP patients with a high inflammatory response measured by CRP. We also need to exclude patients with influenza pneumonia in our trial. It is now clear that corticosteroids increase mortality in patients with influenza pneumonia.(18) We do not know what would happen in other pure viral pneumonias (adenovirus, rhinovirus, and respiratory syncytial virus). In any case, a high CRP ensures that the pneumonia is not purely viral.

The next steps are the following:

    1. Investigate the potential synergies between macrolides and corticosteroids. In an animal model of pneumonia from M. pneumoniae, the association of macrolides and steroids was histologically beneficial.(19) These investigations can be performed in animal models of pneumonia.

    2. Perform a meta-analysis using individual data with a particular focus on severe CAP, as this can provide useful clinical information.

In summary, corticosteroids are useful in treating severe CAP and can help decrease treatment failure and likely mortality. The two important premises for their utilization are a high systemic inflammatory response and the elimination of influenza pneumonia.

REFERENCES

Mongardon N, Max A, Bouglé A, Pène F, Lemiale V, Charpentier J, et al. Epidemiology and outcome of severe pneumococcal pneumonia admitted to intensive care unit: a multicenter study. Crit Care. 2012;16(4):R155. Link DOILink PubMed
Rittirsch D, Flierl MA, Ward PA. Harmful molecular mechanisms in sepsis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(10):776-87. Review. Link DOILink PubMed
Montón C, Ewig S, Torres A, El-Ebiary M, Filella X, Rañó A, et al. Role of glucocorticoids on inflammatory response in nonimmunosuppressed patients with pneumonia: a pilot study. Eur Respir J. 1999;14(1):218-20. Link DOILink PubMed
Sibila O, Mortensen EM, Anzueto A, Laserna E, Restrepo MI. Prior cardiovascular disease increases long-term mortality in COPD patients with pneumonia. Eur Respir J. 2014;43(1):36-42. Link DOILink PubMed
Snijders D, Daniels JM, de Graaff CS, van der Werf TS, Boersma WG. Efficacy of corticosteroids in community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized double-blinded clinical trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181(9):975-82. Link DOILink PubMed
Meijvis SC, Hardeman H, Remmelts HH, Heijligenberg R, Rijkers GT, van Velzen-Blad H, et al. Dexamethasone and length of hospital stay in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a randomised, doubleblind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9782):2023-30. Link DOILink PubMed
GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;385(9963):117-71. Link DOILink PubMed
Confalonieri M, Urbino R, Potena A, Piattella M, Parigi P, Puccio G, et al. Hydrocortisone infusion for severe community-acquired pneumonia: a preliminary randomized study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171(3):242-8. Link DOILink PubMed
Nafae RM, Ragab MI, Amany FM, Rashed SB. Adjuvant role of corticosteroids in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Egypt J Chest Dis Tuberc. 2013;62(3):439-45. Link DOI
Sabry NA, Omar EE. Corticosteroids and ICU course of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Egyptian Settings. Pharmacol Pharm. 2011;2:73-81. Link DOI
Marik P, Kraus P, Sribante J, Havlik I, Lipman J, Johnson DW. Hydrocortisone and tumor necrosis factor in severe community-acquired pneumonia. A randomized controlled study. Chest. 1993;104(2):389-92. Link DOILink PubMed
Nie W, Zhang Y, Cheng J, Xiu Q. Corticosteroids in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47926. Link PubMed
Menéndez R, Martínez R, Reyes S, Mensa J, Filella X, Marcos MA, et al. Biomarkers improve mortality prediction by prognostic scales in community-acquired pneumonia. Thorax. 2009;64(7):587-91. Link DOILink PubMed
Chalmers JD, Smith MP, McHugh BJ, Doherty C, Govan JR, Hill AT. Short- and long-term antibiotic treatment reduces airway and systemic inflammation in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(7):657-65. Link DOILink PubMed
Torres A, Sibila O, Ferrer M, Polverino E, Menendez R, Mensa J, et al. Effect of corticosteroids on treatment failure among hospitalized patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia and high inflammatory response: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313(7):677-86. Link DOILink PubMed
Wunderink R. Corticosteroids for severe community-acquired pneumonia: not for everyone. JAMA. 2015;313(7):673-4. Link DOILink PubMed
Darton T, Guiver M, Naylor S, Jack DL, Kaczmarski EB, Borrow R, et al. Severity of meningococcal disease associated with genomic bacterial load. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(5):587-94. Link DOILink PubMed
Lee N, Leo YS, Cao B, Chan PK, Kyaw WM, Uyeki TM, et al. Neuraminidase inhibitors, superinfection and corticosteroids affect survival of influenza patients. Eur Respir J. 2015;45(6):1642-52. Link DOILink PubMed
Tagliabue C, Techasaensiri C, Torres JP, Katz K, Meek C, Kannan TR, et al. Efficacy of increasing dosages of clarithromycin for treatment of experimental Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(10):2323-9. Link DOILink PubMed


Responsible editor: Felipe Dal Pizzol

Submission On-line

Indexed in

Scopus

SciELO

LILACS

Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB

Rua Arminda nº 93 - 7º andar - Vila Olímpia - São Paulo, SP, Brasil - Tel./Fax: (55 11) 5089-2642 | e-mail: rbti.artigos@amib.org.br

GN1 - Systems and Publications